<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>10 Yetis Public Relations - Comments</title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/</link>
    <description>10 Yetis Public Relations - Public Relations Blog - 10 Yetis</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:jilly@10yetis.co.uk" />
    <generator>Serendipity 1.3.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <managingEditor>jilly@10yetis.co.uk</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jilly@10yetis.co.uk</webMaster>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:50:28 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Rich Leigh: 10 Yetis watched CIPR TV's first broadcast</title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/916-10-Yetis-watched-CIPR-TVs-first-broadcast.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/916-10-Yetis-watched-CIPR-TVs-first-broadcast.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=916</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Rich Leigh)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Thanks Tony, I do wonder if you&#039;re right RE Twitter - definitely seems to pull the industry together. Three weeks til the next one, apparently - looking forward to it.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:15:21 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/916-guid.html#c480</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Tony Veitch: 10 Yetis watched CIPR TV's first broadcast</title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/916-10-Yetis-watched-CIPR-TVs-first-broadcast.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/916-10-Yetis-watched-CIPR-TVs-first-broadcast.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=916</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Tony Veitch)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    It worked very well. In the past such attempts in other industries have been plagued by problems that really, we only now have answers to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1 Bandwidth&lt;br /&gt;
2 Players that work&lt;br /&gt;
3 Light/cheap RT interactivity (twitter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, it probably wasn&#039;t worth doing at all until twitter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good show.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:55:46 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/916-guid.html#c479</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Gregory Kohs: 10 Yetis: Another bloody Times Online paywall blog - is it even worth pitching to?</title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-10-Yetis-Another-bloody-Times-Online-paywall-blog-is-it-even-worth-pitching-to.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-10-Yetis-Another-bloody-Times-Online-paywall-blog-is-it-even-worth-pitching-to.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=892</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Gregory Kohs)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Wales was not &quot;the founder&quot; of Wikipedia.  If you&#039;re looking for someone who could actually be called &quot;the founder&quot;, you&#039;re looking for Larry Sanger.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:30:20 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-guid.html#c463</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Paul Rayment: 10 Yetis: Another bloody Times Online paywall blog - is it even worth pitching to?</title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-10-Yetis-Another-bloody-Times-Online-paywall-blog-is-it-even-worth-pitching-to.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-10-Yetis-Another-bloody-Times-Online-paywall-blog-is-it-even-worth-pitching-to.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=892</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Paul Rayment)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    This is going to be interesting and I have to agree with a poster above that this decesion wasn&#039;t meant to improve &#039;social&#039; it was business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of the day RM has to decide if he wants his old numbers back but nobody &#039;paying&#039; for the service or to have far less readers but all of them paying. In any other business the answer would be the later but with one that takes advertiser&#039;s money it&#039;s much harder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;d be interested to see what advertisers think and not PROs. If ad prices have stayed the same do they rather this model as the fewer readers are those who don&#039;t mind paying for the paper?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it could give them a more neiche readership and audience for advertisers. I only look at the Daily Mail site for a laugh and see what I should be hating this week and I&#039;d never consider myself a Daily Mail reader, so am I as valuable to advertisers as a &#039;proper&#039; Daily Mail reader, one who might pay if it went all paywall?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess we will have to see.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:48:47 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-guid.html#c462</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Rich Leigh: 10 Yetis: Another bloody Times Online paywall blog - is it even worth pitching to?</title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-10-Yetis-Another-bloody-Times-Online-paywall-blog-is-it-even-worth-pitching-to.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-10-Yetis-Another-bloody-Times-Online-paywall-blog-is-it-even-worth-pitching-to.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=892</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Rich Leigh)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Hi Guy, totally agree that with my business head on, it doesn&#039;t make sense to give it away. Although the financials don&#039;t look astounding (the Guardian link in the blog speculates), so I wonder if it&#039;s worth losing the footfall in order to show such a small return. As long as vs. open advertising the profit through the paywall stacks up, I guess its none of our business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a PR perspective, the difficulty isn&#039;t in my mind whether or not to pitch to the Times, although I was interested to see how others in the industry thought about it - it&#039;s how not to miss coverage, and whether PR focus should change as a result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m genuinely interested to see how it&#039;ll go for them.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:54:16 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-guid.html#c461</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Guy Clapperton: 10 Yetis: Another bloody Times Online paywall blog - is it even worth pitching to?</title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-10-Yetis-Another-bloody-Times-Online-paywall-blog-is-it-even-worth-pitching-to.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-10-Yetis-Another-bloody-Times-Online-paywall-blog-is-it-even-worth-pitching-to.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=892</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Guy Clapperton)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    In a way this is the wrong question to be asking. The Times&#039; objective isn&#039;t necessarily to be influential, powerful, retweeted or whatever. It&#039;s a business that needs to show a profit, and giving its core product away made no sense to its proprietor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Wales to be talking about influence and sharing is to miss the point - this was never about influence or sharing until it can be proven that these things affect monetisation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect Murdoch is starting from the premise that giving something away for free when it costs money in a newsagent is basically daft, so you work your way backwards from there. I&#039;m not saying he&#039;s right but he&#039;s doing something rather than nothing about a situation that threatened to become impossible; talk about how it won&#039;t be distributed and shared isn&#039;t going to be all that interesting to him unless it can be shown on a financial spreadsheet.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:37:47 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-guid.html#c460</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Helen Beckett: 10 Yetis: Another bloody Times Online paywall blog - is it even worth pitching to?</title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-10-Yetis-Another-bloody-Times-Online-paywall-blog-is-it-even-worth-pitching-to.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-10-Yetis-Another-bloody-Times-Online-paywall-blog-is-it-even-worth-pitching-to.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=892</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Helen Beckett)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Good question. The paywall issue makes it so tricky to monitor media coverage; share important articles and research writers and issues, especially if your clients are charities who simply cannot justify spending their funding on paywalls.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:15:13 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/892-guid.html#c459</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>PR Nottingham: 10 Yetis Good and Bad PR - Tuesday 10th August 2010</title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/889-10-Yetis-Good-and-Bad-PR-Tuesday-10th-August-2010.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/889-10-Yetis-Good-and-Bad-PR-Tuesday-10th-August-2010.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=889</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (PR Nottingham)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Nice input. Good and bad PR both have a significant impact on publicity. What matters the most is we try to maintain responsible yet effective public relations.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:17:19 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/889-guid.html#c458</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Dan Martin: Five reasons journalists don't care about you</title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/879-Five-reasons-journalists-dont-care-about-you.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/879-Five-reasons-journalists-dont-care-about-you.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=879</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Dan Martin)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Fantastic post. As a small business journalist, I agree with it all! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The biggest thing that annoys me is badly targeted PR and I can be very critical if I&#039;m sent a release that has nothing to do with the subjects I write about. It&#039;s not hard to work out a journalist&#039;s target market; just look at their publication. You&#039;ll soon know the sort of content that floats their boat. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Twitter can also be useful. Follow hacks and keep an eye on what they tweet about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dan Martin&lt;br /&gt;
Editor, BusinessZone.co.uk&lt;br /&gt;
www.twitter.com/Dan_Martin  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:42:14 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/879-guid.html#c454</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>nursing schools: Five reasons journalists don't care about you</title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/879-Five-reasons-journalists-dont-care-about-you.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/879-Five-reasons-journalists-dont-care-about-you.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=879</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (nursing schools)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:44:49 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/879-guid.html#c452</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Vicky: 10 Yetis Examples of Good and Bad Public Relations – Thursday 22nd July 2010 </title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/873-10-Yetis-Examples-of-Good-and-Bad-Public-Relations-Thursday-22nd-July-2010.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/873-10-Yetis-Examples-of-Good-and-Bad-Public-Relations-Thursday-22nd-July-2010.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=873</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Vicky)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Haha I saw this on Jonathan Ross too, brilliant move by Lego, least it shows someone in big corporate land pays attention!!  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:26:42 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/873-guid.html#c449</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Daniella: 10 Yetis Examples of Good and Bad Public Relations – Thursday 22nd July 2010 </title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/873-10-Yetis-Examples-of-Good-and-Bad-Public-Relations-Thursday-22nd-July-2010.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/873-10-Yetis-Examples-of-Good-and-Bad-Public-Relations-Thursday-22nd-July-2010.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=873</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Daniella)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Good 1 lego- heard this on the Jonathan Ross show and thought Lego should jump on it.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:05:05 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/873-guid.html#c447</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Miranda: 10 Yetis Examples of Good and Bad Public Relations – Thursday 22nd July 2010 </title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/873-10-Yetis-Examples-of-Good-and-Bad-Public-Relations-Thursday-22nd-July-2010.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/873-10-Yetis-Examples-of-Good-and-Bad-Public-Relations-Thursday-22nd-July-2010.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=873</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Miranda)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    If the costume is only for a certain height then why is saying that in the advert wrong? It is a justifiable reason. Dont get it if there is no law!!! Nothing press office could have done  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:33:36 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/873-guid.html#c446</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Jonathon Watkins: 10 Yetis is Sold - We Are Joining Gloucestershire Independent Network</title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/856-10-Yetis-is-Sold-We-Are-Joining-Gloucestershire-Independent-Network.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/856-10-Yetis-is-Sold-We-Are-Joining-Gloucestershire-Independent-Network.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=856</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Jonathon Watkins)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    That&#039;s really good news Andy. I&#039;ve attended several networking events and GIN was the best one, which is why I joined. It&#039;s going to be great to have you on board. &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/templates/default/img/emoticons/smile.png&quot; alt=&quot;:-)&quot; style=&quot;display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;&quot; class=&quot;emoticon&quot; /&gt;  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:35:49 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/856-guid.html#c445</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Georgina Read: 10 Yetis is Sold - We Are Joining Gloucestershire Independent Network</title>
    <link>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/856-10-Yetis-is-Sold-We-Are-Joining-Gloucestershire-Independent-Network.html</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/856-10-Yetis-is-Sold-We-Are-Joining-Gloucestershire-Independent-Network.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/wfwcomment.php?cid=856</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Georgina Read)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Thanks Andy - great to have you in the group, and loved your tweets this morning too!  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:24:58 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10yetis.co.uk/public-relations/index.php?/archives/856-guid.html#c444</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>